Thursday, February 07, 2008

Whither to Hold One's Nose

Dear friends, if you don't want to talk politics, this isn't the post for you. Sorry.

I came across this voter's analysis of the situation faced by conservatives as we look toward November:

I’m torn. As a Christian and a staunch conservative, I’ve had to hold my nose every presidential election from 1988 to the present. As someone pointed out, at some point we have to quit doing that and work for good candidates. Is this finally the time to stop voting for the lesser of two evils?

Conservative arguments for McCain over Hillary or Obama: McCain will probably:
a) be better on the war in Iraq;
b) fight terrorism better;
c) nominate (more)conservative justices to the Supreme Court;
d) defend innocent human life (i.e. appoint strict constructionist judges to SCOTUS and elsewhere and curtail embryonic stem cell funding, etc.)

Refutations to those arguments:

a) No Democrat wants a loss in Iraq hanging around his or his party’s neck, so the Democrats will fight to win (though less competently one strongly suspects).

b) No Democrat wants to be on watch for another 9-11 attack so they will fight to win (though again, probably less competently) and McCain’s opposition to Gitmo and tough interrogation and his commitment to other Democrat-style approaches would make him basically indistinguishable from a Democrat President.

c) As someone pointed out elsewhere on this site, while a strict constructionist would be more likely to strike down Roe v Wade, et al, he would also be likely to strike down McCain-Feingold, something McCain won’t want to see happen. Hence, McCain will appoint more Souters and Breyers than Roberts and Alitos.

Finally, given McCain’s willingness to “reach across the aisle,” we are unlikely to see any significantly conservative governance from his administration. At least with Hillary or Obama in office, Senate and House Republicans will have some tendency to impede liberal policy initiatives whereas the very same policy initiatives from McCain will be propelled by Republican party unity.

With all that in mind, perhaps we should hope for a disastrous first two years from a Democrat administration paving the way for a conservative, Republican resurgence a la the 1994 elections. Given how many conservatives are probably going to sit this one out or protest vote for a third party (and I’m seriously considering those), I suspect that that is exactly what is going to happen. McCain needs ABSOLUTELY EVERY SINGLE CONSERVATIVE’S VOTE to even stand a chance against Hillary or Obama and even then may lose big time. The alternative, should McCain win, is to see him govern like a Democrat, recast the Republican Party as Democrat-lite, and have all the disasters the Democrats would bring us hung around the GOP’s neck.

No matter which way this goes, I think conservatives will need to work like mad from now until 2008 or 2016 to build a viable third party. This will either lead to a viable party (probably not) or siphon off enough votes from the Republicans to draw the GOP rightward again.
[see KAS's comment 22 in the linked thread]

I think this analysis has merit, and have little to add. What say you?

2 Comments:

At 6:28 PM, February 07, 2008 , Blogger Unknown said...

I am amazed by how many mainline Christians that I meet who feel that if a Democrat becomes president, that the end is near, signaling that Jesus is coming soon. I could see this coming from the wing-nut Christians out there, but not the mainstream believers. When I asked one of them why they believed this was true, they looked at me like I had just grown a pair of horns. Is this Christianity? Have you encountered this kind of irrationalism?

 
At 10:08 AM, February 08, 2008 , Blogger Aaron said...

Lyle, the short answer is no, I haven't heard any fellow believer state or imply that a Democrat winning in November will hasten Christ's return.

But I have heard much concern, which I consider well-founded, about the kind of leadership we may expect from either Hillary or Obama. Whatever you think about our intervention in Iraq, for instance, it seems prudent to stay and fight long enough to allow their new government to establish some sort of stability. And Obama, when he stops with the flowery rhetoric for a sec and actually talks policy, sounds in favor of cutting and running. Much concern has also been expressed about Hillary's ethics, fundraising, and history of policy intervention, such as the manner and content of her nationalized healthcare initiative back in the day. Ditto for both candidates' disregard for the sanctity of life.

So I have not heard otherwise well-spoken and thoughtful evangelicals predicting God's judgment on our nation if a Dem gets elected, but I have heard plenty of rational concern. For access to some incisive conversation on these matters, I recommend World Magazine's WorldViews blog, which I have on my blogroll.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home